For international brands eyeing the vast Indian market, the greatest threat often comes not from competitors, but from opportunists. A common nightmare involves a global brand preparing for an India launch, only to find that their trademark has already been registered by a local entity. This practice, known as "Trademark Squatting," aims to hold the brand hostage for a payout.
However, Indian courts have consistently come to the rescue of global players. The recent case involving the viral Korean skincare brand Beauty of Joseon serves as a textbook example of how the legal doctrine of "Trans-Border Reputation" can dismantle these squatting attempts.
1. The Case: Beauty of Joseon vs. The Local Squatter
Beauty of Joseon, a South Korean brand, gained immense popularity globally through social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Even before their official entry into India, Indian consumers were importing their products via international aggregators.
Seeing this surge in demand, a local Indian entity proactively filed for the trademark "Beauty of Joseon" in Class 3 (Cosmetics), attempting to block the original owner. When the Korean company moved to register their mark, they faced an obstruction.
The Verdict
The Court ruled in favor of the Korean brand, cancelling the squatter's mark. The judgment relied heavily on the fact that in the digital age, reputation travels faster than physical goods. The court recognized that Indian consumers were already aware of the brand, making the local entity's adoption "dishonest" and "malafide."
2. Trans-Border Reputation: Winning Without a Storefront
Traditionally, trademark rights are territorial—you only have protection where you have business. However, the Trans-Border Reputation Doctrine is an exception vital for the internet era.
Under this principle, if a foreign brand can prove that its reputation has "spilled over" into India through:
- International advertising accessible in India.
- Global e-commerce presence.
- Travel of Indians abroad who interact with the brand.
...then the brand is entitled to protection in India, even without a single physical store or direct sale in the country.
3. Bad Faith Adoption: The "Dishonest Intent" Factor
Section 11(10)(ii) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, requires the Registrar to take into account the "bad faith" involved in filing an application. In the Beauty of Joseon case, the identical copying of the name and even the packaging style by the local entity was prima facie evidence of bad faith.
4. Strategic Roadmap for International Brands
For global brands planning an India entry, the lesson is proactive defense:
- File Early: Don't wait for the launch date. File for trademark protection in India (under the Madrid Protocol or directly) as soon as the brand gains global traction.
- Digital Evidence: Maintain archives of web traffic from India to your global site. This data is gold dust in proving "Trans-Border Reputation."
- Watch Services: Employ trademark watch services to detect and oppose bad faith filings by squatters immediately.
Conclusion
The Indian judiciary has sent a strong signal: It will not allow the "first-to-file" rule to be weaponized by squatters against legitimate "first-to-use" global owners. For international brands, India is a protected jurisdiction, provided you can demonstrate that your reputation precedes your arrival.
Office of M S Sulthan Legal Associates
For legal assistance regarding International Trademark filings, opposition proceedings, and brand protection in India, please refer to the contact details below.